Jim: I tried to e-mail you directly but it just kept getting kicked back, so I have e-mailed the group. Others may want to comment on my view point.
We have used the probe when equipment has exceeded the capabilities of our 3 phase 380 volt, 100 amp LISNs. The probe's correction factor provides valid test results. If this was not true it would not be in CISPR 16 and we would have been dinged during our assessment by a competent body. Rick Linford Facility Manager DNB Engineering, Inc. Utah Voice: 435.336.4433, Fax: 435.336.4436 e-mail: [email protected] Jim Eichner wrote: > I am looking for the experiences of anyone out there who has used the > voltage probe in CISPR 16-1:1993 (First Edition), Figure 10, > particularly in a formal compliance test situation. > > The probe is an alternate method for measuring conducted emissions on > mains inputs where the line currents exceed the capacity of LISN's, and > is the prescribed method for measuring conducted emissions on AC outputs > on things like UPS, inverters, etc. My particular interest is the > latter case, but either will shed some light. > > Rather than bog down the entire forum in the particulars, I suggest > interested people e-mail me directly. I will collect whatever wisdom I > can and send an e-mail to the forum later. Thanks. > > Regards, > > Jim Eichner > Statpower Technologies Corporation > [email protected] > http://www.statpower.com > The opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really > exists. Honest.
<<attachment: vcard.vcf>>
