Scott, 

I fully agree with Mirko especially if large commercial systems such as PBX 
and Key system must satisfy Class B req'ts.  This is another case of creating 
a new req't just for the purpose of creating a new req't. 

Roger Tosto
-----------

> Scott, 
>  
> EMC radiated emission requirement that any telecommunication equipment 
> if not located in a "telecommunication centre" must meet class B 
> limits will hurt telecommunication equipment manufacturers. It will be 
> the cost of ignorance to participate on standards developing 
> body. Customers will ultimately pay for something they not need. It 
> is much more effective to participate in developing new standard, than 
> to modify adopted and published one. 
>  
> In 1991 I helped to block the same proposal on ETSI EE4 by lobbying 
> larger manufacturers participation from different ETSI members at 
> the specific meeting in  Sophia Antipolis Cedex,  France. There 
> were enough votes to reject proposal. Although delegates on EE4 
> formally represent 1/3 manufacturers, 1/3 users and 1/3 
> government/enforcement agencies, average meeting attendance 
> by manufacturers was less than 10 percent. 
>  
> Mirko Matejic 
>  
>  

Reply via email to