Hi Treg world
Re CE mark, 
The mark allows the free movement of goods within the EU and EFTA nations.  
This is because it is indicating conformity against certain directives, which 
apply throughout the union.  Therefore, if a product falls within the category 
of a directive, it requires the mark even if only sold in one member state.  
This legislation will become even more important under the new R&TTE directive 
99/5/EC.

When CE marking a product, you are also declaring conformity against the 
applicable directives (interested parties may request a copy of this 
declaration).  A product that does not meet any directives would not be CE 
marked.  This could occurr for items that do not fall within the scope of 
current directives otherwise for products that do, the product would be 
non-conformant.

Most things electrical will fall under either the EMC directive or the Low 
Voltage Directive and thus require CE marking to show conformity.  SES and TTE 
fall under the SES&TTE directive which is also linked to the harmonised use of 
the CE mark.

Note also that when the R&TTE comes into force, the LVD is to be changed such 
that electrical safety requirements apply to any R&TTE product.

The mark may be prominently displayed on packaging to assist European customs.  
It does not need to be placed on shipping containers as these are allowed to be 
opened and inspected under customs legislation.

This is a slightly rushed response so I appologise if it is not well worded.  
The scope I believe to be accurate but I welcome others to join in on this one.

Bill Ellingford.  Approvals Manager
Motion Media Technology Ltd 

----------
From:   
[email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent:   23 June 1999 15:16
To:     [email protected]
Cc:     [email protected]
Subject:        RE: Packaging vs. Shipping Container

     Richard, Mark,
     
     I have to disagree, the intention of the CE mark is to show 
     compliance with European Directives (those applicable), it allows 
     free movement of goods across the EU borders. It's intention is 
     not to "provide the consumer with information so that they can 
     make an informed purchasing decision."
     
     I would suggest that a product can be designed, manufactured and 
     sold within one European Country without having the CE mark 
     applied. It may well be within the scope of some European 
     Directive, but as long as it does not cross any National Border 
     then the CE mark is not required, so long as it meets the local 
     regulations.
     
     Why would Joe Public care if his pc printer had a CE mark as long 
     as it gives good quality prints and doesn't interfere with his TV 
     set. You're mixing customer needs with regulatory requirements.
     
     I'd say put the mark on any of the packaging you see fit, as long 
     as you can back this up with some rational. If a customs 
     inspector isn't satisfied with the markings on the shipping 
     container, they'll keep peeling the layers until they find what 
     they are after.
     
     Cheers,
     
     Colin.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Packaging vs. Shipping Container
Author:  Non-HP-MSchmidt ([email protected]) at HP-UnitedKingdom,mimegw6
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:    06/23/99 2:29 PM


Richard,
     
I agree.
Your definitions are very rational. 
     
Regards,
     
Mark Schmidt
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Phone:  (616) 257-2469
X-Rite Incorporated
3100 44th Street, S. W. 
Grandville, Michigan 49418
USA
Website -  www.x-rite.com <http://www.x-rite.com>  
     
     
-----Original Message-----
From:   WOODS, RICHARD [SMTP:[email protected]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, June 23, 1999 8:49 AM
To:     'emc-pstc'; 'treg'
Subject:        Packaging vs. Shipping Container
     
Various EU Directives require certain information to be placed on the 
"packaging" of a product. However, packaging is not defined. The intent of 
the requirements appears to be to provide the consumer with information so 
that they can make an informed purchasing decision. Please put on your 
lawyer's hat and tell me if the following definitions are reasonable to 
distinguish "packaging" from a "shipping container" for compliance marking 
purposes.
     
Shipping Container: A protective container in which a product is placed for 
shipping purposes. The container is not intended for public display of the 
product such as in a retail store, nor is it intended to convey product 
information to the consumer; therefore, displayed product information may be 
limited. The product in the shipping container may or may not be enclosed in 
"packaging".
Products intended to be shipped direct to the end user may not include 
packaging.
     
Packaging: A container in which the product is placed for public display 
purposes in retail shops and similar stores. Consumer information and 
certain required compliance information is displayed on the packaging. 

<<application/ms-tnef>>

Reply via email to