Bill, Customers look for what works where they want to use it.
ETSI CTR 3 compliant product (S/T interface) is accepted in the EU, duh, as well as Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Eastern Europe and lots of other places. Most use A-law. The ANSI variant (U &/or S/T) only gets you the US and Canada. However, it's a large market. You'll probably need both eventually. Dick On 3/26/99 9:38 AM Bill Ellingford <[email protected]> said >Hi Treg > >Can anyone help on a Hong Kong ISDN question? > >I understand the regulatory framework and know that a single connection >BRISDN TE does not require mandatory network access approval. There is >however a HK Telecom standard (CR22) for voluntary approval tests. > >When you actually come to offer an ISDN TE in HK you find that the PTO's >can provide any type of ISDN that is either: An ANSI variant, ETSI >variant or ITU-T Generic variant. In all cases, 3.1 kHz speech is u-Law >coded. > >The OFTA can provide (via www) standards for each case (except the ETSI / >TBR3 which are obtainable from ETSI direct). It is OFTA policy to allow >multistandard end user interface provision. > >So, faced with many possible ISDN TE types, does anyone know which is the >most widely adopted and supported type or, from a Sales viewpoint, do >customers look for a particular variant? > >Thanks for any help given: Bill Ellingford Approvals Manager > Motion Media Technology >
