Um, but the Sidekick doesn't have Wifi and neither do any Blackberries.  Where 
did you hear this? It sounds incredibly dumb or just an excuse, since we still 
have very few smartphones that have wifi.  Consumers may want that feature but 
look at how well the 650 has sold without it!  Tmobile could still sell a ton.  
They may want people to subscribe to their hotspot service, but what they have 
done is encourage a lot of gadget heads to just go to another carrier.  Seems 
pretty silly to me...

---------------------
Sent with ChatterEmail
True push email for the Treo Smartphone
www.chatteremail.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Froehle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, Sep 2, 2005 10:55 am
Subject: Re: [Treo] Would you upgrade to a Treo 650 now?

I fully expect the next high-end PalmOS Treo to come out will have Wi-Fi 
(g). If it doesn't, Palm's sorely misguided. Even ol' T-Mobile is requiring 
its 'smartphones' to have Wi-Fi (one of the reasons they haven't adopted the 
650).

On 02 Sep 2005 10:32:00 -0400, Levi Wallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 A better camera and bluetooth is not what makes the difference between the 
 600 and 650. For my money, it was the four times better screen res and the 
 much faster processor and the ability to transfer at EDGE speeds. But 
 there's also the better keyboard, bluetooth, and better camera (although the 
 camera is the same res as the 650, just better exposure and color). Its of 
 course a personal decision and future Treos will be better. Whether wifi 
 will be a feature any time soon is a big question mark. We may just see EVDO 
 and HSDPA Treos before we see wifi ones...
 
 ---------------------
 Sent with ChatterEmail
 True push email for the Treo Smartphone
 www.chatteremail.com <http://www.chatteremail.com>
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Train they call the City of New Orleans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Date: Friday, Sep 2, 2005 10:21 am
 Subject: Re: [Treo] Would you upgrade to a Treo 650 now?
 
 when will the 670 and the 700 come out - any news? I'm wondering if it's 
 not
 worth it to just wait - especially if it has to be an unlocked version.
 I have a Treo 300 and a Treo 600 and I don't see a compelling enough 
 reason
 to junk my investment there for Bluetooth and a better camera. For what I
 need - making phone calls, playing and streaming MP3s, putzing around with
 SSH/VNC/FTP, SMS, occasional email, time-wasting games (for waiting in
 line), and occasional notetaking and reminders.
 One thing that would have swayed me was wifi access and the ability to 
 play
 and stream good quality video. I realize you can do this now somewhat, but
 from what I've seen, the quality leaves a lot to be desired.
 I would like to see what killer-app features the new phones have in store.
 On 9/2/05, Don Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 Yep, what Craig said, except for the part about being happy with things
 before the ROM upgrade. I was never able to satisfactorily install my
 applications to the SD card; now I don't have to (except D2T, which has
 its
 own way of doing that) because the memory block size was reduced. I have
 experienced many fewer resets since



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/y2FxlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to