Well, then let's strip the car, sell it, and when the owner shows up kidnapped we'll use your theory to explain what happened to the crime scene, and the person's prpoerty. Wow, calif law is weird. :)
--- In [email protected], Ed Siebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, if you found the car sitting unlocked in your driveway, you > would be perfectly within your rights to open the door, check out the > car quite thoroughly. EVen sit in it to see what it's like. If the > owner left the key in it, you'd have a very good abandonment defense > if you were to drive it around the block. > > Ed > > On Sep 16, 2005, at 6:27 AM, Craig Froehle wrote: > > > You say "The owner of the unprotected wifi signal has some > > responsibility to protect it as well." That's a fairly specious > > argument, since it would be like saying that anyone without locks on > > their doors gives up the right to not have people entering their home > > or car at will. That's obviously false. > > > G. Edmund Siebel, Jr., Lawyer > post office box mm > balboa island, california 92662-0619 > ph: 949.675.8736 fax: 949.675.0461 > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/y2FxlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
