So I took my 700p to test at the Verizon store and they said the bluetooth
is not working. They are sending me an exchange, since mine is under
warranty.

Does anyone know if Verizon sends new or refurbished Treos for warranty
exchanges? I don't want somebody else's old phone!

They said there's noway for them to tell if its new or refurbished.



> Ditto!  Regarding the previous comment on Bluetooth - it's much faster
> and more stable on the 700p than it was on the 650.  That said, Palm
> seems to have a crappy implementation of Bluetooth compared to other
> vendors, but it works fine, most of the time, for me.  Bluetooth
> certainly shows evidence of having been designed by committee, though .
> . .
>
>
>
> Better camera on the 700p.  Natively handles larger SD cards.  Generally
> snappier performance although I think it has the same processor as the
> 650 (??).  Keyboard is more responsive, phone application is zippier.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Don
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Michael M. Rye
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Upgrading to 700P?
>
>
>
> I've done that switch. The main difference between the two
> is the faster EVDO radio in the 700p, and the increased
> memory (all categories). The increased memory, particularly
> the DBCache, adds to the stability of the 700p greatly.
> It's much more stable than the 650.
>
> Piece of advice: *DO NOT* simply backup your Treo 650 and
> restore it onto the 700p! While the two devices both run
> similar versions of PalmOS, the hardware is still a bit
> different. Files from the 650 will cause issues on the
> 700p. You should install everything you need on the 700p
> from scratch.
>
> --
> Michael
>
> Scandals & Animals wrote:
>> I'm going to check out a Sprint 700P this weekend. Can anyone who's
> made
>> the 650-700 switch give me some things to look at? What are the main
>> differences?
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


Reply via email to