> On 7/30/07, Scandals & Animals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a little frustrated with the limitations of Palm, mainly multimedia, > > I'm surprised...there's very little I ever ask my Treo to do regarding > media that it can't.
----> Ok, I've given this some thought, wondering why some people are satisfied with treo multimedia when it seems virtually nonexistent to me. It occurs to me that we're defining things differently. When people say their treo handles multimedia well, they apparently mean they use some sort of other hardware, maybe a television, a desktop or laptop computer, a converter of some sort, etc. and maybe they use some software to convert it from whatever file type it's in to some other type, transfer it to their SD card, and then use some other software on the treo to play it. To them, that constitutes the treo handling multimedia well. When I say I'm disappointed that treo doesn't handle multimedia well, by handling multimedia well, I mean I'm on a webpage with some sort of multimedia file. I click on it. It plays or does whatever else it's intended to do, perhaps by streaming OTA, or by dlding to the card first and then playing. THAT'S handling multimedia. That's what I'm looking for. >
