Yes, maybe a talentedphone is more fitting.

Thanks,
I'll see you on the web!

Carl W. Brooks
http://www.Palmloyal.com

Palm Podcasts, Daily News, Software, Hardware, Mobile Email Services and More!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, Sep 7, 2007 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Treo] iPhone price cut
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected]

                            

Without support for 3rd-party applications it is my understanding it does not, 
technically, qualify as a 'smartphone'.  At least that is what I read in one 
review.

--
 Edward Fultz
(978) 807-4225
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------- Original message ----------------------
 From: 'Sandro Campos Mancini' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, the 4Gb iPhone is being phased out. Finished.
> 
> And for those thinking that the price cuts have to do with bad sales, iPhone 
> sales topped ALL OTHER Smartphone sales *COMBINED*. Yep, all Nokia Symbian, 
> all Windows Mobile, all Treo devices, TOGETHER. 1.8% of total *PHONE* sales 
> *alone*.
> 
> So Apple is just making sure they rule the (smartphone) world faster. :-)
> 
> I would buy one, if it had support for third-party applications. That's 
> probably what the iPhone 2.0 will offer. Much like I had to wait 3 versions 
> of the iPod Video to finally have what i wanted (a full-screen video iPod).
> 
> []s
> Sandro Campos Mancini
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: 'Levi Wallach' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 12:28 AM
> Subject: RE: [Treo] iPhone price cut
> 
> 
> > That's what you get for being an early adopter.  So, the question is,
> > does this mean the 4GB model is not going to be offered?  Since the iPod
> > Touch is available in 8GB and 16GB, I assume that Apple will soon offer
> > the iPhone in a 16GB version.  The iPod touch is very tempting, but I
> > can't replace my current almost-full 60GB iPod with something with 1/4
> > or less the storage space.  If Apple comes out with a 60GB (or better
> > yet 160GB) iPod touch, it'll be awfully hard to resist, even at a pretty
> > outlandish price! 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

       
                      

Reply via email to