it also has this :) "... I prefer Windows Mobile. I prefer it because it offers more power, better Push email via Exchange, and a bigger, better variety of hardware options. Both OS's are tweakable (though I find that I can tweak WM more easily and with a smaller chance of hurting stability), both offer a large set of 3rd party apps, both are decent at productivity and at entertainment (though I give the edge to WM there as well)."
On Nov 10, 2007 12:47 PM, Don Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True, that, but there is this: > > http://www.wmexperts.com/reviews/smackdowns/smartphone_round_robin_final > _t.html > > which contains this: > > "I want to circle back to the complaints about PalmOS being "old and > tired" partially because it needs to be said again and again: Palm got > their OS right in so many ways that even though it's old it still works > incredibly well. This point was best made by whatever7 in our forums: > > *XP stop being supported doesn't mean its not the best option for many > hardware for the next 5 years. You can make an argument for the > (abandoned) PalmOS. It's one of the best option for some people for the > next couple years. > > That's exactly right. "New" isn't always better, just ask scores of > people who've updated to Vista only to regret it later." > > Pretty much sums it up for me. There's another example of this, a > product called Second Copy 2000, which I used until the next version > came out last year! They just got it right, and had a product that > lasted over 5 years without changing. Look also at CDEX, the venerated > CD ripper. The latest production release was from 2003. Ancient in > computer terms, but I still use it and it still does the job perfectly! > > Older, in computer terms, usually means inferior (the tools, not the > people!), but not always in ways that matter!! > > > Cheers, > Don > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Alli > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 9:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Treo] Interesting comparisons of smartphones incl Treo > > I just looked at that and couldn't even figure out what to click on for > what. Talk about a poorly designed page.... > > Jean Morgan wrote: > > http://roundrobin.smartphoneexperts.com/2007/ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- ============================== War Eagle [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
