And that was Palm's biggest mistake.  Not to have released their new  
OS two and a half years ago.

That gap probably has now killed them, with Google doing all of that  
OS work for free. :-)

Roger

On Nov 17, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Craig Froehle wrote:

> Just to elaborate on my previous comment: I've seen Palm/Palmsource
> demos of the new Linux-based Palm OS as far back as May, 2005 --
> that's two-and-a-half YEARS ago -- and everything Palm/Palmsource
> talked about doing (with one exception) is here on Android (if you
> also watch the made-for-developers movies, you learn a lot more):
> - multi-tasking...check!
> - widely scalable UI for many screen resolutions...check!
> - utilizes Linux 2.6's kernel and h/w drivers...check!
> - is very pretty to look at...check!
> - has a great/simple UI...check!
> - has wide developer support....check!
>
> The only thing we haven't seen mentioned was a Palm OS compatibility
> layer for handling legacy Palm OS apps. With Access' Garnet Virtual
> Machine (which runs on Linux...the OS for those Nokia Internet
> Tablets), that problem is solved. In other words, we would have all
> the benefits of the old Palm OS *and* its
> promised-but-yet-to-be-delivered replacement, but Palm itself would be
> completely absent from the product.
>
> And that's why Palm needs to get on board the Android train; they're
> only hope of adding value is hardware and maybe some apps and/or UI
> tweaks (easily done due to Android's openness).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Nov 17, 2007 6:58 AM, JLV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > very nice, WOW
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Craig Froehle wrote:
> >
> > > Everything the next Palm OS should have been...or be. Palm's in
> > > trouble if it doesn't get on board.
> > >
> > > On Nov 16, 2007 10:50 PM, Paul Blumstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FJHYqE0RDg
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> http://www.GearBits.com -- Tech. Culture. Ideas. Opinions.
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to