I can't do the txt-speak. I have to write it out However, very often
i'll get lazy and not use the correct case. And I agree - it takes an
extra brain-cycle to decode it. Like zipping a .rar file.

On 11/23/07, colin.fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm ok with it to some extent, I tend to do it at 95mph (or reliving
> 300baud/pay for your usage days - shudder)
>
>
>
> the one word I do hate is prolly
>
>
>
> ttfn
>
>
>
> -colin
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alli
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 6:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: txt shorthand in emails (was "Re: [Treo] Using my Treo as a
> portable player")
>
>
>
> Maybe it's a "teacher thing," but I'm with you 100% on this.
> Abbreviating 3 letter words drives me round the bend.
>
> Craig Froehle wrote:
> > Vishal,
> > I'm not picking on you with this question...you can post however you
> > like...it's just your post reminded me that I wanted to ask this
> > question:
> >
> > Does anyone (else) find txt shorthand in emails (e.g., "u" and "ur"
> > instead of "you" and "your/you're") aggravating to read?
> >
> > It's not that I don't understand it, and I assume people do it because
> > typing on the Treo is best when minimized, but it's like reading the
> > same typo over and over again (I do a lot of proofreading of students'
> > papers, so I am forced into "editor" mode more than I'd otherwise
> > choose).
> >
> > Grammatically indignant,
> > - Craig :-)
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
==============================
War Eagle

Reply via email to