I do, I do! -----Original Message----- From: "Don Ferguson"
>Who is it that wants a Treo or Centro IX?? It's me!! > >Cheers, >Don > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vishal Sheth >Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:11 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: txt shorthand in emails (was "Re: [Treo] Using my Treo as a >portable player") > >In the normal what you say is correct. But the correct english is " it's I". >This is available in wren & martin english grammer book. > >Vishal >----------------------- >Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Colin McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Saturday, Nov 24, 2007 9:29 pm >Subject: Re: txt shorthand in emails (was "Re: [Treo] Using my Treo as a >portable player") >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected] > >Vishal, at that door, you should reply, "It's me". > >On Nov 24, 2007 4:45 AM, L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> well, this is just one of the threads going on. I don't think > addressing protocol in a message group is that bad. It's just an > question of style. remember - no one here is under an obligation to > help. But I would interpret it as ... some will respond better if they > do not have to decode the message first. > >> I've posted a bunch of messages (usually regarding atypical usage) > that havent been responded to. I think people will respond if the > question/problem hits a subject they've dealt with. The easier it is > to read as well as the closer it hits to home, the more responses > you'll get. > >> > On Nov 24, 2007 2:23 AM, Vishal Sheth ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]<vusheth%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > is this an english literature class? why is the subject deviated >from > treo? The very purpose of the group is treo and palm, not english >language > or litrature. Everyons has his/her own way of working with things. If so > then why do people reply inbetween the mail/message of the other >person? I > don't think this comes under an english grammer or litrature. I guess this > is more irrirating to read those mails than the shorthand once. > > if
