I am it!
On Saturday, 2007-11-24 12:59:00, Alli wrote: > I do, I do! > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Don Ferguson" > > >Who is it that wants a Treo or Centro IX?? It's me!! > > > >Cheers, > >Don > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vishal > >Sheth > >Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:11 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: txt shorthand in emails (was "Re: [Treo] Using my Treo as a > >portable player") > > > >In the normal what you say is correct. But the correct english is " it's I". > >This is available in wren & martin english grammer book. > > > >Vishal > >----------------------- > >Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: "Colin McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Saturday, Nov 24, 2007 9:29 pm > >Subject: Re: txt shorthand in emails (was "Re: [Treo] Using my Treo as a > >portable player") > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected] > > > >Vishal, at that door, you should reply, "It's me". > > > >On Nov 24, 2007 4:45 AM, L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> well, this is just one of the threads going on. I don't think > > addressing protocol in a message group is that bad. It's just an > > question of style. remember - no one here is under an obligation to > > help. But I would interpret it as ... some will respond better if they > > do not have to decode the message first. > > > >> I've posted a bunch of messages (usually regarding atypical usage) > > that havent been responded to. I think people will respond if the > > question/problem hits a subject they've dealt with. The easier it is > > to read as well as the closer it hits to home, the more responses > > you'll get. > > > >> > > On Nov 24, 2007 2:23 AM, Vishal Sheth > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]<vusheth%40gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > is this an english literature class? why is the subject deviated > >from > > treo? The very purpose of the group is treo and palm, not english > >language > > or litrature. Everyons has his/her own way of working with things. If so > > then why do people reply inbetween the mail/message of the other > >person? I > > don't think this comes under an english grammer or litrature. I guess this > > is more irrirating to read those mails than the shorthand once. > > > if > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
