Yes, I have "unlimited" texting on my daughter's line. It is not really unlimited because it is only on those phones in Verizon with a limit (1000, I think) outside of Verizon. And I think there is even a limit on the In-network text messages. But it is better than paying on a per message basis. I will have to get my son a phone in the next year or two and I am sure it will have the same requirement. I don't use text messaging - nor does my wife nor mother-in-law.
Who do they think would be stupid enough to consider this plan? Someone who texts every minute of every day? I don't get it. -- Edward Fultz (978) 807-4225 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Harold M. Goldner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ed - > > I have 5 phones on the 1400 family plan; including 2 college students and a > high > school student. The unlimited texting is what's important because my > children > all have cell phones fused to their fingers. I have to have a separate 6th > phone on its own for my father-in-law. We never come close to the 1400 > minutes, > so our bill is less than $200 plus my data for the Treo. > > The 'unlimited plan' still has caps on data and is $199 for the first 2 > phones, > and $99 for the next 3, so my bill would go up to $350+. > > Makes no sense whatsoever. > > Harold > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected], > Sent: 2/19/2008 3:24PM > Subject: [Treo] Verizon New Rate Structure > > > Has anyone seen the new fixed-price rate structure for Verizon? I don't think > it > is very good - at least for family plans - as the least price is $199 for 2 > lines. I pay less than that to share 1400 minutes between 4 lines. For us > that > is practically unlimited. AND they don't include the data plans. I think it > is > $99 for a single line. > > I don't see us going to this anytime soon - unless Verizon forces the issue. > > -- > Edward Fultz > (978) 807-4225 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
