Synergy, yes - the WHOLE PRE is cool!!  Even with the limitations of a v.1,
there's no way I would go back to the Blackberry, which was, itself, way
ahead of the Treo/Centro.

 

The Pre rocks!

 

And the iPhone looks, well, so BIG now....

 

Cheers,

Don

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam
Cayze
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Treo] Callerid pictures fuzzy??

Even my pic is fuzzy, but perfectly clear on Facebook itself :( That
aside though, the whole Synergy thing is REALLY cool :)

________________________________

From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
Levi Wallach
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:24 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: Re: [Treo] Callerid pictures fuzzy??

So strange, the ones I've seen all look fine. I wonder though if it has
to
do with the size of the image that your friends uploaded for their
profiles?

Levi Wallach
blog: http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com
<http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com> 
tweet me @dvdmon (http://twitter.com/dvdmon <http://twitter.com/dvdmon>
)

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]
<mailto:sam.cayze%40rollouts.com> 
<mailto:sam.cayze%40rollouts.com> > wrote:

> All my facebook caller ID pictures are completely pixilated as well :(
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
> Don Ferguson
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:23 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: RE: [Treo] Callerid pictures fuzzy??
>
>
>
>
>
> An update:
>
> I noticed that a picture I took of a friend (with the Pre) showed up
> VERY
> clear when I assigned it to her. That got me looking a bit deeper.
>
> Here's what I've come to so far:
>
> If you use a picture that is 1520x2032 (the resolution of the Pre's
> camera)
> and have the part of the picture you want to show up when a call
happens
> (the face, or the business logo) be approximately 800x800 of that
> 1520x2032
> picture, it will work VERY well!
>
> Getting that done is somewhat complicated, and I haven't figured out
yet
> how
> to simplify it. What I'd like is a way to outline part of a picture
that
> I
> want, and say "Scale the whole picture so this part is 800x800". Then
I
> could just crop or fill the rest of the thing to 1520x2032 and I'd be
> done.
> As it is, I sort of have to eyeball it and come close.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Don
>
> From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com<treo%2540yahoogroups.com>
> >
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com<treo%2540yahoogroups.com>>
> ] On Behalf
> Of Don
> Ferguson
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 9:43 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com<treo%2540yahoogroups.com>
> >
> Subject: [Treo] Callerid pictures fuzzy??
>
> I have callerid pictures in Outlook which transfered down the
BlackBerry
> for
> picture callerid. I was happy to see that these same pictures transfer
> down
> to the Pre for callerid, but even though the pics are 320x320, they
> still
> show up fuzzy. Anybody have perspective on that? I'll probably try to
> intuit what the optimal dimensions and resolution of a Pre callerid
> picture
> are to see if they can be cleared up, but thought I'd ask in case
anyone
> has
> done it already, or has any perspective on this!
>
> Cheers,
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to