My TP is serving me well. I still miss some PalmOS stuff, but the TP is
more stabile than my 650 or 680 -- I believe because I was trying to
make the earlier Treos do too much.
The TP forces me to use Outlook, a major source of aggravation on
my part, not because it doesn't work, but because it's Microsoft.
But with the addition of a couple of apps, it's a pretty tolerable
device.
= There is no speed dial included, but I've found InesoftPhone very
acceptable.
= I still have not found a WM replacement for such phone logging apps as
Comet.
= Pocket Informant does much of what Agendus did on PalmOS but doesn't
do on WM.
= MortPlayer allows playing an entire mp3 as an alarm, which WM's alarm
didn't do.
= and right now I am tethered to my Ubuntu-powered Acer. Tethering is
built into the Pro -- no need for PDANet, which worked super on PalmOS.
While I am tethered, the email just told me I had some new unread
messages, and I've created anappointment and carried on a brief SMS
conversation.
I still have no love for MS (which is why my laptop runs Ubuntu. But I
have to admit the Pro is doing what I need it to do with a minimum of
hassle.
GEORGE FITZSIMMONS wrote:
> I just got my Palm Pro upgrading from a 755P. The Pro had a steeper learning
> curve then I was used to but I like and it is very stable and once I learned
> where everything was it seems to be a very good maching.
>
> Bob in New Mexico
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gail<mailto:[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 2:53 PM
> Subject: [Treo] Considering a Palm Treo Pro
>
>
> I currently use a Palm Centro and am considering a Palm Pro.
> Can anyone give me their experiences with the Pro and whether they are
> happy with it?
> Thank you
> Gail in Wisconsin
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
