time to add some items to the nit list!
On 2/4/10, John Messeder <[email protected]> wrote: > That could be. The tech was a little surprised at the paucity of options. > OTOH, he redirected my mail to another server, and it's working > fine. So the problem is, since the Pre is the new kid on the block, to > find a way to make it play nice with old servers. And to do that, we > need to know what's wrong, which we don't. > > On 2/4/2010 6:45 PM, ldouglas wrote: >> is it that the breadth of options setting up the pre's imap client >> aren't as great as those in other clients?
