first article seems somewhat credible even if coming off as a hit piece

second article is poor all around

On 3/23/10, RickS <[email protected]> wrote:
> I came across these articles a short while ago.  I find them intriguing,
> although I don't necessarily agree with everything they say.
>
> Personally, it seems to me that Palm is going to be in play for their
> intellectual property.
>
> Rick
>
> http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/03/21/who-will-buy-palm/
>
> http://www.techyell.com/2010/02/how-to-read-palm-windows-phone-future-pre/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to