PalmOS under the covers was garbage, but the *feature set* they added to it,
and we liked, that they have not yet added to WebOS, is one of the two
biggest problems, along with crappy hardware.

Actually, every time I criticize the hardware I have to remember that I have
the Pre, not the Pre+.
 
Pre+ users:  how do YOU feel about the hardware, after using it for awhile?
In the 3 days I had one, I actually thought it was quite good, but that's
only 3 days!

Cheers,
Don


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig
Froehle
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 10:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] Nothing since Thursday?

That was because Palm OS was garbage and the Treo hardware was excellent.

Now, however, Palm's webOS is excellent and its hardware is garbage.
So it needs to make more devices with webOS, not more Pres with
different OSes.


On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Christopher Kontos <[email protected]>
wrote:
> One idea that I had is for Palm to make a line of Pre's that run Android
or &nbsp;Windows Mobile 7. Having a choice of a different OS worked pretty
well for the Treo.
>
>
>
> -- Sent from my Palm Pre Plus
> On Apr 24, 2010 8:16 AM, Don Ferguson &lt;[email protected]&gt; wrote:
>
>
> &nbsp;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And Craig would be right!  As he has pointed out, people have been
predicting the doom of Palm Computing since the Pilot 1000 was released.  
Palm has a history of defining an industry and then letting things slip
away, and then doing it all again.  While it COULD be that this is the end
for Palm (just as it COULD be that RIM is about to go out of business, or
Toyota, or *any* company), it just seems like the tech media loves to find
someone to dump on, and all too often it’s been Palm.
>
>
>
> Just start at the top and work down:
>
>
>
> RIM is headed for bankruptcy or sale!!  Nope; too powerful; too
entrenched.
>
>
>
> Apple is headed for bankruptcy or sale!!  Nope; to pretty.
>
>
>
> Google is headed for bankruptcy or sale!!  Nope; too world-dominating.
>
>
>
> Palm is headed for bankruptcy or sale!!  Yeah!  That’s it!  That’s our
target!
>
>
>
> It *feels* bad for Palm right now.  It *feels* like we’re in the eye of
the hurricane and are about to get blown over.  I don’t know that any of us
has any idea, though what the reality or intent at Palm is right now.
 Perhaps they like it like that!
>
>
>
> SSFM (that’s Speaking Strictly for Myself), Palm needs to get its poop in
a group in two areas:  1) adding back in the things the Treo/Centro could do
that WebOS still can’t and 2) dramatically upping the hardware build quality
for non-Verizon users.  If, *suddenly*, Palm released a Pre Plus Plus that
was as solid as the HTC hardware (hmmmmmmmmmm), with Sprint kicking in
tethering for free, and all the little touches that they seem to be ignoring
that they *already did* in the Treo/Centro (and about which I’ve
complained), I would probably close my ear to the siren song of the Evo.
 The “new” Palm seemed headed in the right direction at first, with frequent
incremental improvements that filled in the holes.  Some of the holes are
still there, though, and so it starts to feel a little like Microsoft who
has some issues still in Outlook that date back to the late 1990’s, or the
old Palm that rested on its laurels (what are laurels, anyway – must look
that up) until RIM and Apple and Android took the market completely (in the
US, of course; still don’t understand the rest of the world’s fascination
with Symbian and Nokia).
>
>
>
> My $0.02US.
>
>
>
> COME ON PALM!!!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Don
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alli
>
> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:46 AM
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Nothing since Thursday?
>
>
>
> Oh, don't say that! You'll get Craig all in a lather.
>
>
>
> On 4/24/2010 9:39 AM, Charles G. "Chuck Boulais, CLU, MCP wrote:
>
> &gt; The calm before the storm? It’s pretty clear that Palm is nearing the
end . . .
>
> &gt;
>
> &gt; Chuck B.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links




Reply via email to