In order to jump through the hoops to genuinely convince folks they're
dealing with "general intelligence" it is likely going to be necessary
for the "AI" to emulate the jumbled up bag of cognitive errors and
biases that make people human. When the "AI" attributes much more
significance to loss of something than gaining that same thing, for
instance, then we might go "Whoa! That thing is creeping me out it's so
real!"
:-)
-Pete
On 7/29/19 11:08 AM, John Vaughters via TriEmbed wrote:
What we (Society) call Machine Learning, I call weighted big data with
Artificial Stupidity. Yes the machine is learning, NO it is not
intelligent. Quite the opposite. In fact, it reminds me of the old
Sesame Street game, One of these does not belong with the other. Smart
comparisons based on big data inputs with massive processing. The
current Machine Learning will be useful as a tool, similar to a
ratchet wrench is to a car. It will help us for specific tasks, but
not all tasks. Ever try to use a ratchet wrench as a hammer, right,
well it does work, but can give very bad results. That is experience
talking :)
_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
