Maybe make a 1/4 wave ground plane instead of a dipole? The ground would 
connected to a set of 4 or more ground radials down tilted 45 degrees and a 
single straight up and down stick. http://ccarc.org/_misc/so-239_ant.html 
<http://ccarc.org/_misc/so-239_ant.html>

I was thinking about what you said about stepping the frequency as the car 
moved.  Would successive cars entering the chain have different frequency 
selections? 

I wonder if you couldn’t choose a different frequency for the actors 49mhz, 
900mhz, 2.4ghz or something, and have a central site that had a separate 
receiver for each microphone, and then mix the audios together into a single FM 
transmitter.  I suspect the one-way wireless mike to receiver has been done and 
you may even find somebody’s maker-space article on the subject.  Make 5 of 
those for your five actors, then a single FM transmitter with the decent 
antenna you are discussing would talk to the cars throughout the entire 
drive-through.  

Tadd - KA2DEW




> On Sep 28, 2020, at 10:31 PM, Pete Soper via TriEmbed <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I modeled 1/2" diameter elements with EZNEC and the length of each 1/4wl 
> element comes out to 29.1 inches when cut for 98MHz with the antenna 10 feet 
> up. 
> 
> The graph of SWR vs frequency from 88 to 108MHz is below.
>  <http://triembed.org/images/FM-DIPOLE.png>
> The closer to resonance the lower the SWR and greater proportion of RF out vs 
> turning the power into heat. So if you end up needing to transmit at, say, 
> 89MHz you'd simply make the elements 98/89 of the above dimension and it 
> should keep the SWR as low as it can get. If you were transmitting at 107MHz 
> you'd multiply by 98/107.
> 
> But the other problem with going unbalanced into a dipole is that it doesn't 
> necessarily radiate like a dipole (i.e. two lobes perpendicular to the 
> elements). As Dan mentioned, the feedline ends up radiating and it tends to 
> be at wonky angles relative to the axis of the antenna elements. The coax 
> coil (or purpose-made balun below) solves this by isolating the feedline from 
> the antenna. It's a pain to have the antenna only be effective for a piece of 
> the azimuth range you need. From the description you probably want an omni 
> pattern. The gain off the ends of a horizontal dipole is terrible and the 
> gain falls off pretty severely more than around 40 degrees right or left of 
> the broadside direction.  So in addition to a balun you might consider making 
> the dipole vertical. A vertical dipole is omnidirectional outward with the 
> nulls up and down.  But the balun is key to getting a predictable pattern.
> 
> You can get baluns from Digikey, by the way. The  MABA-011040 
> <https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/macom-technology-solutions/MABA-011040/1465-1702-1-ND/5131112>
>   is rated for 1-300MHz and doesn't look like it would be hard to solder. 
> This could go at the antenna and then you'd use a simple run of coax to it. 
> 
> -Pete AD4L
> 
> <opiadpmmadeneekh.png>
> 
> On 9/28/20 12:29 PM, Brian via TriEmbed wrote:
>> Hi Folks, 
>> 
>> I know there are several radio-smart people on this list, so I hope the rest 
>> will forgive the noise as I pose a couple questions here. 
>> 
>> The questions first; I'll provide background afterward. 
>> 
>> I have settled on a digital FM transmitter chip (Silicon Labs' SI4721), and 
>> a simple dipole antenna.  Two questions arise from this decision: 
>> 
>> 1. The transmitter has a single-ended RF output, but will be fully isolated 
>> from earth ground in operation (running on batteries or an isolated AC/DC 
>> supply).  A dipole is a balanced load, but since "ground" of the radio 
>> circuit is isolated, can I just treat it as "balanced" and connect the 
>> circuit ground to the other half of the dipole?  Or do I really need to use 
>> a balun for a proper balanced output?  Coverage area actually needs to be 
>> very small (< 100'), so I'm not majorly concerned with impedance mismatch 
>> losses, etc. 
>> 
>> 2.  I'll be using 1/2" copper pipe as the elements, held inside a larger PVC 
>> enclosure.  What's the best way to bond wires to the pipe?  Should I just 
>> solder them on?  Tap a hole and use a screw to clamp them?  Some kind of 
>> shark-bite approach?  Does it even matter at all? 
>> 
>> Here's the background: 
>> 
>> My church does a Christmas program called the Drive-Thru Christmas, which is 
>> made up of five live-actor scenes distributed around our parking lot.  
>> Guests are typically given a narration on CD which they play inside their 
>> vehicles as they move from scene to scene.  In order to improve our social 
>> isolation this year, I'm doing some R&D on the "talking sign" idea, using 
>> five separate short-range FM transmitters to broadcast the scene's narration 
>> to the guest's FM radio in their car. Each transmitter would broadcast on a 
>> different frequency, and some system would step each transmitter through the 
>> list of frequencies in time with the car's movement through the scene, so we 
>> can maintain our 5-car pipeline but not require the guest to re-tune their 
>> radios.  We tried using an internet streaming option last year (for folks 
>> with smartphones linked to their car stereos) but that, I hear, was an 
>> abject failure with many people unable to access the stream. 
>> 
>> Well anyway, thanks in advance for any advice! 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> -Brian 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list 
>> 
>> To post message: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org 
>> <http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org> 
>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org <http://triembed.org/> 
>> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
>> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe 
>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list
> 
> To post message: [email protected]
> List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> 

_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to