On 3/31/23 00:35, Tadd Torborg via TriEmbed wrote:
 From the linked article

*"The majority of digital audio equipment operates at a sample rate of 44.1 kHz or precisely 215 Hz”*


This is a patently false statement even if you add in the missing caret.

Yeah, so as others have pointed out, the real answer to the silly headline question is because it makes a 16-bit counter overflow at exactly 1 Hz, which is super useful for driving digital timepieces, and apparently happens to be a comfortable resonating frequency for a quartz crystal.

There's no clever relationship between 2^16 and 44.1 kHz, though. 44.1k is not a nice power of two. It comes, possibly, from NTSC TV scan rates; see https://dsp.stackexchange.com/a/17702

I would question the use of the word "majority" in that sentence as well. I'd claim the vast majority of digital audio equipment is capable of handling a variety of sampling rates.

-B (who dabbles in the guts of digital audio)

_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Interest Group mailing list

To post message: TriEmbed@triembed.org
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: https://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:unsubscribe-triem...@bitser.net?subject=unsubscribe
Searchable email archive available at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/triembed@triembed.org/

Reply via email to