Kingston,

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kingston Smiler <kingstonsmi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> <Kingston>
> Typically PBB-VPLS is used to avoid exposing the customer MAC in service
> provider network. In case of TRILL packet over MPLS, already the customer
> MAC is encapsulated inside the TRILL header. Having said that, do we really
> need to consider TRILL over PBB-VPLS.
> </Kingston>
>
>>
PBB (and by extension, PBB-VPLS) is not just used for C-MAC hiding, but
also for provider infrastructure scaling, so I would think the answer is
yes. Matthew, do you agree?

Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill

Reply via email to