On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kingston Smiler <>

> <Kingston>
> Typically PBB-VPLS is used to avoid exposing the customer MAC in service
> provider network. In case of TRILL packet over MPLS, already the customer
> MAC is encapsulated inside the TRILL header. Having said that, do we really
> need to consider TRILL over PBB-VPLS.
> </Kingston>
PBB (and by extension, PBB-VPLS) is not just used for C-MAC hiding, but
also for provider infrastructure scaling, so I would think the answer is
yes. Matthew, do you agree?

trill mailing list

Reply via email to