Kingston, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kingston Smiler <[email protected]> wrote:
> <Kingston> > Typically PBB-VPLS is used to avoid exposing the customer MAC in service > provider network. In case of TRILL packet over MPLS, already the customer > MAC is encapsulated inside the TRILL header. Having said that, do we really > need to consider TRILL over PBB-VPLS. > </Kingston> > >> PBB (and by extension, PBB-VPLS) is not just used for C-MAC hiding, but also for provider infrastructure scaling, so I would think the answer is yes. Matthew, do you agree? Cheers, Andy
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
