Sue, My comments have been resolved, and I feel that this draft is ready for publication. And to answer your first question, yes, this is needed functionality.
Thanks, Andy On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > This begins a 1 week extension to the WG LC for > draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS > that we started last November. Due to a comment from Andy Malis: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07971.html > > We took a set-back and solved these problems. Please review this draft > again for the following points: > > 1) Does TRILL need to run over MPLS? Some data centers are > interconnected over MPLS. Does this capability aid in deployment of TRILL? > > 2) Is this specification ready for publication? > > 3) Do you know of any problems with this specification? > > If I get enough comments within the 1st week, we will close this WG LC. > If not, we will length it. > > > > Please remember we are trying to complete all WG LCs by the end of > February. Please be prompt to answer these WG LC requests so that we can > include all the drafts in the WG LCs. > > > > Cheerily, Susan Hares > > _______________________________________________ > trill mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill > >
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
