There is no time left to accommodate delays in uploading the updated
draft.  I need to review this and EVERYTHING ELSE from trill that will be
published from the WG by Tuesday so it can make the last telechat on March
8 before IETF 101.

The trill working group is closing.

On Feb 15, 2018 2:35 PM, "R Parameswaran" <parameswaran...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I support this as author, please see inline @[RP]:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on  draft-ietf-trill-parent-selection-02.txt (2/2
> to 2/16)  which you can find at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-parent-selection/
>
>
>
> In your comments, please consider:
>
> 1)       will the documentation of this problem and its solution benefit
> operation of TRILL networks?
>
>
> [RP] Yes, the problem (discussed in the draft) has been seen in customer 
> deployments, and I believe the technique listed in the draft will help 
> alleviate the issue.
>
> 2)       Is this document ready for publication?
>
>
> [RP]: It's nearly ready. Donald (Eastlake) was kind enough to offer some 
> suggestions and a template draft (based on the latest public draft) with page 
> numbering laid out. I'll upload this within a day or so - these are purely 
> textual changes, there are no functional edits in this upload.  Wondering if 
> you could extend the last call by a few days to accommodate this..
>
> thanks,
>
> Ramkumar
>
>
>
> As a chair who is concerned about the operational aspects of TRILL, I
> encourage you to read and review this TRILL document.
>
>
>
> Sue Hares
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill

Reply via email to