Susan,
These links weren’t hard to find. That shouldn’t be surprising - there have
been line-rate hardware encapsulated and encrypted Ethernet links for a while
now.
They include GRE over IPsec, among others.
The points I want to make are brief:
- this solution isn’t remotely needed because *existing* commercial
devices and protocols are sufficient
- the solution as described is incoherent from a transport perspective
Fixing the title and/or polling vendors won’t change the above.
This document, in its current form, is unnecessary and incorrect. If nobody
else can see why, then there are bigger problems than I can fix here.
Joe
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Joe:
>
> Thank you for the post on cavium’s and Cisco’s GRE. I hope the vendors with
> TRILL products and these hardware devices will investigate this solution.
> However, the suggestion IPSEC + upper layers came from those vendors with
> TRILL products.
>
> As to the name, I acknowledge the issue. If you have a proposed solution
> that you think fits, we’re listening (Alia, Jon, I and the authors) are
> listening. The document title can change during the IETF LC process.
>
> Sue
>
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 4:40 PM
> To: Susan Hares
> Cc: trill IETF mailing list; [email protected]; Alia Atlas
> Subject: Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-14.txt - Consensus
> reached
>
> FWIW:
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>
> Thank you for your comments on the draft-ietfd-trill-over-ip-xx.txt The WG
> has reached consensus on the draft, and it will be sent forward to the IESG.
>
> I want to thank Magnus Westlund, Ines Robles, and Joe Touch for their
> targeted reviews.
>
> Joe asked two important questions that I want to chat about in announcing the
> result.
> 1) Why IPSEC + TCP/UDP tunnels
> 2) Why the name TRILL over IP? – it is really TRILL over IP enabled
> Transport port protocols
>
>
> During this WG LC, I spent time looking back into my notes to check our
> evaluation of the alternatives GRE, TLS, or DLTS. I also asked the WG
> leadership team (Jon, Sue, and Donald with Alia Atlas help) to discuss these
> points that Joe raised. Here’s what I found.
>
> 1) Why IPSEC and TCP/UDP tunnels
>
> After I walked through the WG archives, I found that over several IETFs we
> debated TLS, DTLS, and GRE. Our most substantive debate was at IETF 91.
> The WG had settle on utilizing GRE, TLS, or DLTS – until hardware vendors
> implementing TRILL came to chat with the WG at IETF 91. The hardware
> vendors asked that we would utilize IPSEC and higher layer tunnels (TCP/UDP)
> so that TRILL switches could operate at line speed using these IPSEC
> processing chips off board. The WG decided to listen to vendor creating and
> deploying TRILL capable devices.
>
> The hardware vendors reasoning still seems valid to the WG chairs and the
> WGs. If in the future hardware comes up with TLS, DTLS or GRE at Ethernet
> switch line rates and vendors want a TRILL product with these tunnels, I’m
> sure that a Routing AD or the RTGWG draft will sponsor such a draft.
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/lan-switching-and-routing/3850-gre-support-in-hardware/td-p/2402487
>
> <https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/lan-switching-and-routing/3850-gre-support-in-hardware/td-p/2402487>
>
> https://www.cavium.com/pdfFiles/Nitrox_III_PB_Rev1.0.pdf
> <https://www.cavium.com/pdfFiles/Nitrox_III_PB_Rev1.0.pdf>
>
>>
>> 2) Is the name TRILL over IP valid?
>>
>> Now as to the name, Joe was correct the name should be changed since it is
>> really TRILL over IPSEC + Transport. Donald’s make the change to the title
>> of the document, and in the document.
>
> “IP transport” implies using IP as a tunneling layer, which is not part of
> this document’s proposed approach.
>
> Further, the description of how it interacts with TCP is incoherent to anyone
> familiar with TCP transport (“slicing” packets and claiming to place them
> directly into TCP payloads).
>
> Joe
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
