Thanks Jeremy. I didn't really think it was a problem. Ken
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 14:09, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > For some reason, an upgrade to apt on the server side doesn't generate > headers in a way that's perfectly compatible with all previous versions > of apt. I don't quite understand it, but I am looking into it. It's > not anything to really worry about, as the RPMs themselves are still > signed by Red Hat -- this only has to do with a signature/checksum for > the release file. (The release file was never signed anyway.) > > --Jeremy > > -- > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."--Benjamin Franklin > " 'Necessity' is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it > is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."--William Pitt > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
