On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 16:25, Jon Carnes wrote: > [snip]
Interesting comments about performance. That's something I haven't had occasion to deal with. > Plus Sendmail gets a bad rap. If your DNS is setup properly then > Sendmail (in the default config) will work for 95% of all applications. I agree with that. I do have one server for which the default configuration is fine, and I'm still running sendmail under the adage of, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." But any time I have to start changing things around, especially advanced features like the masquerading mentioned at the start of this thread, I instanlty replace it with postfix. --Jeremy, who suspects that most people on this list don't have super high-volume servers. -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
