On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 09:57, Brian Henning wrote: > Hi Folks, > Is there some certain set of circumstances that would cause spamc to > completely skip a message? Or is there a particular set of circumstances > where spamc won't make any marks on a message? I was expecting that spamc > would make a mark on all messages it examined, either to say X-Spam-Status: > Yes or X-Spam-Status: No... More and more spam is slipping through lately > (which is to be expected, I suppose), but a lot of it has no sa headers at > all, which almost suggests it's not getting scanned. Here's the juicy bits > of my /etc/procmailrc file; maybe someone will see something wrong with it?
Sometimes spamc/spamd itself will refuse to scan a message, and return it to procmail without adding the headers. This could be due to large size; huge messages are sometimes skipped because it can really bog-down the pattern-matching within spamd. I think there is a setting for this in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf, but a quick look through perldoc Mail::SpamAssasin:Conf isn't revealing it, so maybe I'm hallucinating. Also make sure you don't have any other settings that might be causing the headers not to be set -- there are a lot of options on what to do with the headers. Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
