I can agree with that last statement... of course, file extensions are good for associating files with the right programs, or possible programs for some files since some files can be opened by more than one program. And you are right, as many or as few as you want, sounds good to me! :)
On 6/17/05, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/17/05, David McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I knew that if index.php was in the list, it would do it... I suppose > > I read it as if it wasn't there. :) so why index.html over > > index.htm ? I hate the .html extension... I think .htm is better... > > mainly b/c it is shorter.. but hey, it doesn't really matter. :) > > have a great weekend folks! > > .htm harkens back to the old 8,3 DOS/Windows file name restrictions. > > Real operating systems let you use as many characters as you need, or > as few as you want, or none at all. > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc > -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
