Roy Vestal wrote:

Thanks Aaron, the spanning tree was the issue.

Now a follow up question: So on this same dos setup I have multiple Windows servers with 2 nics, the first nic is on the REAL network, the second on this private in question. If I try to do a net use g: \\servername\share, it says "the computer name specified is not found in the network path cannot be located". My boot process mounts one server as a drive but manually it doesn't. I've looked through the autoexec.bat on this and I don't see anything that would cause this. I've even put "hosts" and "lmhosts" in a dir that's on the path to no avail.

Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this part?

As Ryan basically pointed out, this isn't really a DNS issue it's a Netbios issue. DOS machines don't use DNS for name resolution, they use Netbios (Lanman) name mappings on the local network. Unfortunately, I have very little experience with Netbios in DOS, and have little desire to acquire any more experience in said field of "expertise". Having said that, the basics are that it's a broadcast protocol that attempts to locate other hosts by name. If you're not on the same broadcast domain, you need a hard mapping (like the lmhosts). If you're with in the same broadcast domain, it should "just work". I'd go with Ryan's suggestion, or perhaps further experimentation / googling on the lmhosts file.

Best of luck!
Aaron S. Joyner
--
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc

Reply via email to