On 1/10/06, Brian Henning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > Just wondering if someone could shed some light on why it seems that > some tcp utilities seem to ignore the kernel routing table. For > example: (Sorry about the wrapping..) > > % /sbin/route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 192.168.10.0 192.168.1.125 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > > % telnet 192.168.10.4 > Trying 192.168.10.4... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host > > Um. Yes there is a route to the host. Right there in the kernel > routing table. It says to go by way of .1.125. > > What gives? I think this also affects the cups printing manager as it > does nothing but report no printer at the specified address/port.
1. Have you actually verified that you can reach .1.125? 2. Try a traceroute to 192.168.10.4. 3. Try a ping to 192.168.10.4. Report back. Cheers, Tanner -- Tanner Lovelace clubjuggler at gmail dot com http://wtl.wayfarer.org/ (fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an increscent, all sable. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
