no, it will just be storing of vidoe's, im planning on ripping some to most
of my dvd collection, was told 1 gig is of decent quality, so, i rounded up
because im not entirely sure i remember the conversation correctly
From: Brian Henning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <[email protected]>
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] file formats
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:20:48 -0400
I have to recommend against FAT for video files. Sure, FAT-32 claims to be
able to address something like 2TB of storage, but I think you're taking
chances by routinely storing upwards-of-two-GB files on any FAT partition.
For the record, FAT-32's maximum single-file size is (2^32) - 1 bytes, or a
byte less than 4GB (see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463/EN-US/ ).
The OP said he guessed his files would be 1-2 GB in size.. But if we're
talking about video editing here, depending on the project, it seems too
likely that that'll prove a conservative estimate.
~B
Ian Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:29:31AM -0400, Brian Henning wrote:
There are ext3 drivers for Windows, though I'm not sure if they're any
better at writing than Linux's NTFS modules..
~B
They almost certainly are, given that ext3 is open. If you plan to be
blorping data back and forth between windows and linux, I don't
reccomend NTFS. You /can/ write to it, but sometimes (often, in my
experience) it breaks, and why use it when you can use something that
works? (eg FAT).
--
----------------
Brian A. Henning
strutmasters.com
336.597.2397x238
----------------
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
