On 12/4/06, Matt Frye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, Jason Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, rdiff-backup's incremental system is a little fragile for comfort, > although we've been using it for over a year with no major problems, other > than the fact that it tends to choke on files >6GB, but that's a pretty > specific problem for us :). Well, it's something. I don't anticipate having any files quite that big, but I do need something reliable. Define reliable? Well, basically no maintenance. This will be in a system deployed to customers, who won't have much access to it. Primary use will be by scripts and our second line support.
By unreliable, I mean that one error in an increment can hose all your increments, which isn't really fun. Then again, we've been using it for a while with no software issues as far as that happening. -- Jason Faulkner http://oldos.org -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
