In this thread we've seen some metrics and performance opinions on greylisting... what about the latest spamassassin working with sa-update?
On 1/28/07, Cristóbal Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GPG doesn't really mean much for people using webmail. Suggestion there? -CMP On 1/28/07, Daniel Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Carnes wrote: > > You wouldn't have to check the authentication of every message passing > > through, but you could if you wanted to. Ideally though, you would just > > check the ones that seem suspicious. > > Well, if you're talking about issues of trust, GPG does this already, now. > > If you like, you can only accept properly signed email, and you can go > further and only accept properly signed email from people you trust. > However, again, for this to work to stop all spam, everybody would have > to adopt it, and keys used by spammers would have to be blacklisted. > > -- Dan > > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > -- Cristóbal M. Palmer UNC-CH SILS Student -- ils.unc.edu/~cmpalmer TriLUG Vice Chair "There are many roads to enlightenment, and thus many roads back to the One True Debian" --crimsun -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
