I'll second that. SA is awesome--with tweaking. Even so, if you have a published address that gets a lot of mail and is an initial point of contact, eg. [EMAIL PROTECTED], you're still going to get a significant amount of spam unless you're willing to live with false positives and/or spend a lot of time tweaking. I'm itching to try greylisting, too.
Thanks, CMP On 1/29/07, Magnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David McDowell wrote: > In this thread we've seen some metrics and performance opinions on > greylisting... what about the latest spamassassin working with > sa-update? I've actually not been too impressed. Lots of spam gets through, and I do maintain a corpus of manually sorted ham and spam that is updated every 24 hours. I tend to err on the side of caution with my UCE controls, though, because I've found repeatedly if I get much more aggressive I get false positives. Unacceptable. I'm between OpenBSD boxes right now (the new firewall isn't quite to my liking yet) so I'm not getting as much pre-SA filtering as I would like. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
-- Cristóbal M. Palmer UNC-CH SILS Student -- ils.unc.edu/~cmpalmer TriLUG Vice Chair "There are many roads to enlightenment, and thus many roads back to the One True Debian" --crimsun
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
