If Thunderbird doesn't recommend any non-free software, then there's no reason we can't include it as is, branding and all.
I could be wrong, but the way I understand it is like this: Firefox
recommends non-free software, so we include a modified version that doesn't.
If we make changes to Firefox, we can't call it Firefox, or use the Mozilla
branding.
- [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird asmegir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird adrian . malacoda
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird rochefort . benjamin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird asmegir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thunderbird magicbanana
