Maybe I'm not following what you are getting at or what your point is although here goes on countering the thinking that free software is some how harder to use.

There are many advantages to free software. Many revolve around the freedom bit or extend from it at least.

Most of the things you have said I feel are just wrong. GNU/Linux comes in different flavours and some are harder than others. However there are things that make most distributions easier to use than non-free platforms. Bugs aside GNu/Linux is easier to use. In most cases the solution to the bugs is the selection of a less buggy distribution.

I'll give you some reasons why I see GNU/Linux as easier to use for the masses than the non-free operating systems:

1. Automatic update system for core software- you don't have dozens of pop ups with dozens of different and confusing screens

2. Security- I don't mean more eyebals equals better security- although that helps. I mean users actually get the updates for the tools that matter. Firefox, LibreOffice, Thunderbird/Evolution, Pidgin/Empathy, etc.

3. There is less maintance - when was the last time you had to remove or reformat due to a virus? Most people have to hire some one or take it to staples, bestbuy, or some similar tech shop.

4. Consistancy. while gnu/linux is known for a lack of a standard interface (UI between gnome/kde/etc apps) there is consistency over the years for those who want it. Every three years there is a new long term support release. Nothing changes for three whole years.

5. Every thing made for gnu/linux is 'plug-n-play'. If it isn't then the device wasn't really made for gnu/linux. What I mean by this is that hardware that is deisgned for gnu/linux is 100% free software compatible. Free drivers, free firmware, and fully supportable by the community. That means you get updates through your distribution and don't have to worry about getting it to work. It just does.

6. It is very easy to install software risk free. There isn't a learning curve to doing it either. Once a users has been taught that anything 'here' (the repository) is safe there isn't anything to worry about. The learning curve I'm referring to is 'figuring out what is safe' not the actual clicking of a button.

7. When was the last time a program actually required user input or differed from another program's installation procedure? gnu/linux has excelent consistency here. You install every program the same way (again, through the repository).

8. Whoever supports you can actually support you if they know what they are doing. we would never be able to do this on Microsoft Windows.




Reply via email to