I read today that RedHat will pay Microsofot to make sure their operating
systems are able to boot with the upcoming Secure Boot that Microsoft may or
may not require OEMs to have:
http://www.geek.com/articles/news/redhat-will-pay-microsoft-to-ensure-fedora-18-runs-on-windows-8-pcs-2012061/
With this in mind, it would suck if operating systems will require payment to
Microsoft to be able to install with Secure Boot in place. How would this
affect community distros like Debian, Slackware and Arch? If that is the
case, would Canonical pay Microsoft for Ubuntu? I say this because Trisquel
is based off of Ubuntu and their payment towards it would then hopefully
affect Trisquel due to the shared code base.
I am aware that there are companies like Think Penguin and System76 that
think about GNU/Linux support as their main concern, but Secure Boot affects
the average consumer who buys a computer from a store or a retailer like
Dell.
Let's just hope Stallman doesn't have another heart attack if this is the way
of computing from now on.
- [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of Trisquel. Wh... tegskywalker
-