Notice that rms did not have any heart attack.
I actually hope no other GNU/Linux distribution will sign pacts with
Microsoft to merely be able to boot their system. If Canonical follows Red
Hat (and, I believe Novell) then manufacturers will keep on satisfying
Microsoft's demands (against discounts on the Windows licenses I guess) and
we will be screwed. Notice in particular than, as far as I understand, you
cannot modify the kernel and still be able to boot it. Freedom 1 is under
attacked.
- [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of Trisquel... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of... Rick C. Hodgin
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Secure boot and the future o... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of... andrew
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the futur... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of... migatheotaku
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the futur... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the f... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and t... sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot ... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the futur... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Secure boot and the future of... andrew
