Re: [Trisquel-users] Free Software Foundation recommendations for free operating system distributions considering Secure Boot

[jason]

t3g said "the big problem here with requriring their key to be made available  
and therefore it potentially being revoked by the certificate authority."

That statement's made on a misunderstanding of GPLv3. If you read the FSF's  
statement Canonical/Ubuntu's position isn't based in reality, and they didn't  
even talk to the FSF beforehand -- which seems strange since the FSF wrote  
the GPL and hold the copyrights on GRUB2. Don't you think you'd *want* to  
talk to the the people that wrote the license and are in a position to  
enforce it before making a decision like that?