Re: [Trisquel-users] Free Software Foundation recommendations for free operating system distributions considering Secure Boot

[tegskywalker]

Say Canonical played along and used a GPLv3 bootloader with key and followed  
the advice of the FSF. The act of revoking the key by a 3rd party certificate  
authority means that it is up to the discretion of that authority if the  
methods of using the key follows their rules. If that company says to not  
share the key then what? Does that mean that Ubuntu and other GNU/Linux  
distros are at their mercy from now on?