> Few things: > > 1. I didn't bring this thread back from the dead. I am flattered that it > is > still considered important and people are still commenting on it.
You talk as a politician. But ok, you are in your right of deciding what people think that it is important. You are also in your right of calling your friends to the Trisquel forum for increasing the number of people giving you the reason (I'm not saying you did it). > I'm > overly > flattered that I am considered a valuable member on this forum to keep it > from being stale. I mean... there isn't a new release of this distro on > the > horizon any time soon so many of you simply need a little entertainment. I don't consider entertainment the fact of wasting time for avoiding that some one continue talking against free software values. > 2. People paying to implement a karma like system? It is very hypocritical > to > call me childish when thats what that type of system is. It is a passive > aggressive way of sticking by your guns and personal opinon on a person or > topic. It reminds me of school. Are you scared? Am I bully to you? Maybe > people like you need this type of system to make you feel better because > you > are threatened. Or it could be your Aspbergers. Do you have a better idea? The situation is, here we value and promote freedom of software users, since it is the mission of Trisquel (Trisquel is not an open source project but a free software project). And someone is talking against that way, for example, talking bad of people trying to communicate free software ideas. Most of people doesn't want to employ their time for answer your long comments, but it is a problem because you talk occasionally against free software ideas. > 3. The problem isn't with the FSF entirely, but their mascot. He's a dick. I cannot see any difference between the opinion of free software of FSF and the opinion about free software of their president. It would be a bit stupid. If you some case where FSF stated a different opinion or procedural method different to what RMS does, please, point me to it. You usually say that you are with one part but not with other one, but this could be not compatible. However, that way it seems you have a moderated opinion, if one doesn't know the background. > End of story. The point about managing trolls is that it is difficult to not answer them, when they assert that they have the reason. It makes difficult for me the solution to point 2.
