Users would get updates to critical pieces like abrowser, linux-libre kernel, and hplip. It probably isn't necessary to update much else. Maybe libreoffice. The majority are better off with a stable release with solid long term support and few major changes.
This could be a good thing if it forced Trisquel to move to putting out LTS
based releases only. Moving to base Trisquel off LTS releases and updating a
handful of individual packages (so a sort of partial rolling release) would
be ideal I think.
- [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (speculation) andrew . roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (spec... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (spec... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (spec... composr
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (spec... Fabian Rodriguez
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling release? (... andrew . roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling releas... onpon4
- [Trisquel-users] Youtube--was Re: Ubuntu = r... Dave Hunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling releas... andrew . roffey
- [Trisquel-users] Video downloaders--wasR... Dave Hunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Video download... Ivaylo Valkov
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu = rolling re... Ivaylo Valkov
