On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 23:46 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Also, I have heard of companies releasing binary firmwares under the GPL, but > > not the source.
Err.. that's doesn't make sense as I understand the GPL; it requires the source to be made available and for it to be in the form it's usually edited in. Of course it wouldn't be the first time a company has said something stupid. -- Bob Ham <[email protected]> for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
