I tried searching through my bookmarks to see if I kept the link I read, but
no luck. But I did find another example with an internet search:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/03/msg01895.html
> I think that if software is distributed under the GPL without source code
ever being provided, it is not possible for anyone else to redistribute it at
all under those terms,
Maybe... or maybe the binary and source are initially the "same thing" if the
binary is GPL'd by the author. The definition of "source" in the GPL:
> The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a
work.
