It would only be easily usable by atheists, though (how would a Christian or Muslim explain something like that?), and it could make enemies of people we don't need to make enemies with (very religious people, anti-religious people), so for the moment, at least, best to keep that idea in the "interesting thought experiments" section.
I don't think they would accept it as "religious", but that would be an
amazing and useful hack: creating a "religion" of software freedom. It
wouldn't even be a total lie, since we do object to nonfree software on moral
grounds. That would eliminate their ability to push us aside so easily: we
could simply say "that goes against my religious beliefs", and that would be
the end of the discussion.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? gustavo_cm
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? gp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? migatheotaku
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulso... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? carlosgeos
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Times New Roman, compulsory? tegskywalker
