superbyel...@yahoo.com wrote .. > I was curious. Mozilla Firefox is not considered free software because > it has some proprietary things concerning logos, correct? > > I would assume this was true also for Mozilla Seamonkey? I am asking because > frankly I despise Firefox-type browsers. I like Seamonkey and all it has to > offer, built-in e-mail for one.
The Mozilla trademark policy is problematic and it doesn't apply to just Firefox. http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2011-08/msg00014.html > Are there any truly free alternatives to Seamonkey (if it isn't free itself) Not that I know of. > > Also, why does Firefox come up in the Synaptic Repository if it is not free? It doesn't. What Trisquel has is modified version called A Browser.
