El 19/05/13 05:44, [email protected] escribió: > +3 -6 Richard Stallman's objective was not to work with the non-free software but to use it to develop a free alternative. Of course anyone is free to use non-free software. But it is no way a benefit for them. Anyone is free to cut themselves with a razor. But if you help them, that will do them no good even if that helps them keep their job. The only way to do good onto them if you helped them would be if they would not be able to survive if they would not use non-free software.
By the way of BIOS issue, it is not good to use a BIOS that is modified by another person without your ability to audit it. The next step is to have a BIOS that is completely modifiable. And the last step is to have free available schematics for hardware. We are on the first step now. We should not go back and loose the advance we have achieved. -- Saludos libres, Quiliro Ordóñez Presidente (en conjunto con el resto de socios) Asociación de Software Libre del Ecuador - ASLE Av de la Prensa N58-219 y Cristóbal Vaca de Castro Quito, Ecuador (02)-600 8579 IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net?channels=asle&uio=OT10cnVlJjEwPXRydWU3a Todo correo que reciba será tratado como información pública, de libre copia y modificación, sin importar cualquier nota de confidencialidad.
